Clevis Hook Testing: How Mazzella Assisted NASA
Clevis hook testing helped NASA evaluate a lifting component designed for a fuel storage system. Mazzella assisted by applying loads to NASA’s custom-manufactured hooks to assess their performance and help establish a working load limit.
In this video, we explain how Mazzella supported NASA’s Glenn Research Center on a project exploring oxygen liquefaction and storage for future space missions. See how the hooks were tested, which part of the test assembly failed, and how the results supported the project’s next steps.
For engineers, lifting and rigging professionals, and anyone involved in evaluating custom components, this case study shows how load testing can reveal deformation and failure points before a component is put into use.
What You’ll Learn:
- Why NASA needed to test custom clevis hooks for a fuel storage system
- How Mazzella set up the hooks for load testing
- What happened to the hooks, pins, and connecting plate during the break test
- How the testing helped establish a working load limit
- How the project related to NASA’s research into oxygen liquefaction and storage
Who This Is For:
- Engineers designing or specifying custom lifting components
- Lifting and rigging professionals
- Safety and quality personnel involved in component testing
- Anyone interested in Mazzella’s role in NASA’s research
Need Help With Lifting or Rigging?
Contact Mazzella’s Rigging Division to discuss your application or component testing needs.
Transcript
Intro
Since you’re watching this, you most likely know that there are several companies focused on the exploration of the planets in our solar system. And in this video, we get the opportunity to look a bit above an overhead crane system for a second and see how Mazzella Companies was able to take part in the research of an application focused on solving one of the biggest challenges with interstellar travel: ridiculously high gas prices.
Pound Per Payload impact on a launch
The cost of launching something out of Earth’s atmosphere is roughly $10,000 per pound of payload. So take a second and think about how heavy your suitcase would be if you knew you were heading to Mars for a vacation or, probably, for scientific research. If that suitcase runs a minimum of 50 pounds, you’re looking at a checked bag fee of $500,000. Now, add the weight of all the other equipment and the other people that need to go to Mars with you, and you’re looking at a pretty hefty fee.
Getting interstellar travelers back home
Aside from the cost of fuel per pound of payload, there’s another looming problem that NASA and their partners are working to solve: ensuring that future interstellar pioneers have enough fuel to come back home.
Bigger rockets aren’t the solution
And beyond that, perhaps having a source of fuel and resources that would allow us to start using our neighboring lunar and Martian surfaces as a kickoff point to explore the planets beyond the asteroid belt. Now, you might think that the quick fix would be to build bigger rockets with larger fuel storage capacity, so you could take even more fuel with you. However, that solution doesn’t help the price per pound of payload issue or the sustainability of space exploration.
Scavenging to survive off Earth
But what if you didn’t need to take any extra fuel with you? What if, instead of needing fuel for the entire trip, you could refuel from the International Space Station using fuel produced from the resource material on the moon? And what if the fuel you were going to use to either get back home or to explore even further was already waiting for you on Mars? NASA’s Moon to Mars initiative is focused on learning how to live away from Earth by utilizing the available resources on the other planets in our solar system. Because of that, several divisions of NASA and other private companies like SpaceX and Boeing are researching ways to live and thrive beyond Earth’s atmosphere, specifically for this project, on Mars. Two problems that NASA scientists and engineers are working through are the creation and storage of oxygen and the creation and storage of a viable fuel source.
An introduction to In-Situ Resource Utilization
For the oxygen issue, NASA has already been practicing the baseline process in-situ resource utilization, or ISRU for short, on Mars. It’s the process that produces oxygen out of the resources available on the Martian surface.
An introduction to Liquefaction
And for the fuel issue, that’s where the team at NASA’s Glenn Research Center and our team here at Mazzella Companies, both based in Cleveland, Ohio, come into this story. The NASA team is proposing that one could use the process of liquefaction on the oxygen created by the ISRU to create a brand new storable fuel source. NASA plans to demonstrate how the liquefaction of oxygen would work either on a lunar or a Martian surface, helping move forward the mission to Mars and beyond. Their plan is to create and store the fuel for up to two years, allowing Martian explorers to leave our atmosphere with a decreased mass of fuel, reducing the cost of liftoff while providing a method to refuel and come back home.
NASA’s Engineering team explaining the Clevis Hook
NASA’s engineers have been hard at work designing and specifying several components that would be used in the liquefaction and storage system. But those components needed to be tested to ensure they can hold up in various hazardous environments.To do that, NASA needed to establish a working load limit on the weakest part of one specific component, a clevis hook manufactured by them, that would connect to and lift the fuel tank into position for use.
Mazzella’s role in assisting NASA
The clevis hook was taken to Mazzella Companies’ headquarters, where our engineers were tasked with using the fabricated grommet sling with an eyebolt to allow our testers to simulate the approximate forces that they would experience on the Martian surface. Since the tank would be filling up with fuel, it was important that NASA’s clevis hook could withstand an array of forces inflicted upon it without bending or breaking.
The importance of proof testing your components
During the break test, it wasn’t the clevis hook or the pin that broke; it was the steel plate used to connect the two clevis hooks after reaching 14,000 pounds. The pin of the clevis hook did show signs of bending and deformation, but also exceeded NASA’s expectations. The purpose of these tests was to establish and certify a working load limit of NASA’s clevis hooks so they could be used in the fabrication of their liquefaction fuel storage system. With the testing completed and NASA’s clevis hooks certified, their engineering department can now focus on the fabrication, testing, and demonstration of their fuel systems. Those demonstrations are planned to take place late summer or early fall of 2019.
Closing
When two companies start working together toward a common goal, there is nothing that cannot be achieved. So if you need help with your lifting and rigging application or just have a few questions to ask, don’t hesitate to reach out or head to our website and schedule a free consultation.
FREE Downloads!
- Rigging Gear Inspection Field Reference [Guide]
- Sling Working Load Limits [Poster]
- Lifting and Sling Hook Selection [Guide]
- Synthetic Slings At A Glance [Guide]
- Hook Latch Replacement Cross-Reference [Guide]
<!–[if lte IE 8]><![endif]–>
hbspt.cta.load(3336966, ’72b9168f-0e22-4ba5-8342-b180f9e3d7fc’, {“useNewLoader”:”true”,”region”:”na1″});
Learn More! Articles, Videos, and Podcasts
- How to Choose the Right Crane Block for Your Lift
- Can You Replace a Hoist Chain Yourself? Safety, Hardness, and Calibration Explained
- Rigging Slang Terms: Common Names for Lifting Equipment
- How to Safely Use a Forklift Boom: Four Tips to Consider
- Sling Protection: What It Is, Different Types, and When to Use It
- Our Certified Rigging Inspectors Can Help Keep You OSHA/ASME Compliant
Contact Mazzella
- Schedule Remote or In-Person Rigging Training
- Contact Mazzella’s Rigging Division
In this video
0:00 – Intro
0:27 – Pound Per Payload impact on a launch
0:55 – Getting interstellar travelers back home
1:10 – Bigger rockets aren’t the solution
1:24 – Scavenging to survive off Earth
2:07 An introduction to In-Situ Resource Utilization
2:20 – An introduction to Liquefaction.
2:58 – NASA’s Engineering team explaining the Clevis Hook
3:22 – Mazzella’s role in assisting NASA
4:10 – The importance of proof testing your components
4:30 – Closing
Disclaimer:
Any advice, graphics, images, and/or information contained herein are presented for general educational and information purposes and to increase overall safety awareness. It is not intended to be legal, medical, or other expert advice or services, and should not be used in place of consultation with appropriate industry professionals. The information herein should not be considered exhaustive and the user should seek the advice of appropriate professionals.
